• Search books
• Topics
• New Arrivals
• New
• Coming Soon

Napoleon, for and against

Title	Napoleon, for and against
Original title	Napoleon: voor en tegen in de Franse geschiedschrijving
Author	by Pieter Geyl; transl. from the Dutch by Olive Renier
Publication	Jonathan Cape
Size	477p
Language	ENG
ISBN
Topics	Historiography--France France--History--1804-1815 (1st empire) Biography--Comparative Biography--Rulers (heads of gov./ chief exec.) Biography--Military Napoleon I (Emperor, 1769-1821)
Notes	In 1940, Geyl wrote an article on how historians view Napoleon. It was due to be published in June 1940, but after the German occupation in May 1940, the publishers declined to publish Geyl's article out of the fear that comparisons could be made between Napoleon and Adolf Hitler. In September 1940, Geyl used his article for the basis of series of lectures at the Rotterdam School of Economics. In October 1940 the SD (Security Service) of the SS took Geyl hostage in retaliation for what the Germans alleged to be maltreatment of Germans interned in the Dutch East Indies. Geyl spent thirteen months at the Buchenwald concentration camp. Even after his release from Buchenwald, Geyl continued to be held by the Germans at a Dutch prison until he was finally released for medical reasons in February 1944. Napoleon For and Against (1946) was an account of how French historians of different ages and views have regarded the French emperor. From Napoleon's time to the present, French historians have presented Napoleon as either a Corsican adventurer who brought death and destruction to France or as a patriotic Frenchman who brought glory and prosperity. Geyl used his book to advance his view that all historians are influenced by the present when writing history and thus all historical writing is transitory. In Geyl's view, there never can be a definitive account for all ages because every age has a different view of the past. For Geyl the best that historians could do was to critically examine their beliefs and urge their readers to do likewise. Geyl felt that history was a progress of "argument without end", but did not feel that this meant that an "anything goes" interpretation of history was acceptable. [wikipedia]

921

NAPOLE

41197

Available